I've followed forums, Autodesk articles, and been troubleshooting with Autodesk tech support for a week now. I've done all the recommended cleanup and optimization stuff, trust me.
And in an extended troubleshooting effort, I deleted all the stuff that really lands in complex vector, leaving essentially linework. There are 3D data, but everything I'm trying to render 99.9% of the time is 2D as far as the screen is concerned. Most of the drafting that I do is really 2D, mostly simple vector (linework and hatching), a little complex vector (solid-shaded hatching). I'm not thrilled with my memory or disk benchmarks, but they're in the 60s for percentile, which suggests they're not the weak link. 2D graphics, on the other hand, is 462 or 34th percentile. 3D graphics, I'm at 7369 or 86th percentile. The most surprising result was fairly low benchmark score on 2D graphics with this card. I ran a benchmarking test on my machine, and found some interested results.
#Quadro p4000 nvidia drivers
2x 6-core Xeon E5-2640 CPUs, 64 GB RAM, SSD, P4000 GPU, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, very latest drivers and BIOS, etc. I had a custom computer built around the Quadro P4000 card. I decided to buy/build a new machine myself. I upgraded to C3D 2019, and had slightly worse (than my already crappy) performance, and it was affecting my work substantially. More than enough per Autodesk's hardware specifications (the rest of the system, too). I had been using AutoCAD C3D 2014 for a while with relatively poor performance - slow and choppy panning and zooming with 2D drafting, often locking up and crashing on anything more serious - on a Dell M4800 with a Quadro K1100M card. I'm happy to see benchmark tests for other cards and hardware configurations, but I'm specifically looking for a 1:1 comparison of the nVidia Quadro P4000, since that's my card.
#Quadro p4000 nvidia software
If you've got something else (that's free), feel free to run it on your software and just let me know which you used so I can grab it myself. It will assess and stress-test CPU, memory, drive(s), 2D and 3D graphics. If you're willing to run a similar test, I'd really love to see the comparison.
#Quadro p4000 nvidia trial
I used the free trial period of PassMark PerformanceTest to benchmark my machine. Run a benchmark test on your system, or at least the graphics card, and report the results to me, please. List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.If you're using an nVidia Quadro P4000 GPU, specifically, I'd like to ask you a huge favor. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.
0 kommentar(er)
